top of page
AdobeStock_224367493-scaled.jpeg

civil rights & liberties

Civil rights and civil liberties in the U.S. refer to the legal protections and freedoms that ensure individuals are treated equally and fairly under the law.

general notes

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

civil liberties protect individuals from government overreach (e.g., freedom of speech, right to privacy)
civil rights ensure equal treatment and protection from discrimination (e.g., voting rights, anti-discrimination laws)
civil rights movements have driven legal changes expanding protections for marginalized groups
key debates include affirmative action, LGBTQ+ rights, voting access, and how far federal enforcement should go
rights are shaped by both legislation and Supreme Court rulings interpreting the Constitution

major acts of Congress

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

banned discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex, national origin in public places, employment, and schools

created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

outlawed discriminatory voting practices like literacy tests

gave federal government power to oversee elections in places with history of voter suppression

Fair Housing Act of 1968

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

prohibited housing discrimination based on race, religion, or national origin

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

banned discrimination against people with disabilities in employment, transportation, and public accommodations

more about affirmative action

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

policies that aim to increase diversity and reduce discrimination by considering race, ethnicity, gender as a factor in decisions like college admissions or hiring
race could be considered to help build a more diverse student body
June 2023, supreme court ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard & UNC that colleges can no longer use race as a factor in admissions, ending race-based affirmative action in higher education
majority 6-3 said considering race violates equal protection clause of 14th amendment
argued race-based admissions were not precise, time-limited, or neutral and could harm applicants like Asian Americans
court emphasized individual merit and said applicants should be evaluated on personal experiences, not race alone
liberal justices (3) disagreed and said decisions ignores reality of racial inequality in education
     argued race-conscious policies needed to ensure equal opportunity and to address past and present

     discrimination

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

key Supreme Court cases

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

ended segregation in public schools

said separate but equal doctrine is unconstitutional

a legal principle from Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) that upheld racial segregation as constitutional if facilities were equal

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

guaranteed right to an attorney for defendants who can’t afford one in criminal cases

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

required police to inform suspects of their rights when arrested (“Miranda rights”)

Loving v. Virginia (1967)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

struck down laws banning interracial marriage

Shelby County v. Holder (2013)

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

weakened the Voting Rights Act by removing federal oversight of state election laws
led to new state-level voting restrictions

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

legalized same-sex marriage nationwide under the 14th Amendment

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

equal protection and due process rights

party views

democrats, in general....

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

support expanding protections against discrimination
support stronger voting rights laws and oppose voter ID laws arguing they suppress turnout
back LGBTQ+ rights, affirmative action and police reform
support legislation to protect rights for marginalized groups
often favour a broader interpretation of civil liberties like privacy and due process protections

republicans, in general....

Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited
Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 2_edited_edited

emphasize individual rights and equal treatment but often oppose policies like affirmative action or expansions of federal civil rights laws
support voter ID laws and measures that protect election integrity
some support religious liberty laws that may allow individuals to opt out of LGBTQ+ protections
are less likely to support expanding federal civil rights enforcement or identity-based protections
favour limited government, including how civil rights rules are enforced

bottom of page